Mandegar Farzami vs Ekaterina Kldiashvili Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 May at 06:31 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Farzami vs E. Kldiashvili

IRI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Farzami 1 - 0 Kldiashvili
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mandegar Farzami winning 2 and Ekaterina Kldiashvili winning 0. The last match between Mandegar Farzami and Ekaterina Kldiashvili was at the W15 Tsaghkadzor, 12-05-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Clay, with Mandegar Farzami getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Farzami | 1 |
| Kldiashvili | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q2) W15 Tsaghkadzor(05-12-25)
M. Farzami vs E. Kldiashvili H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.61% (16-15) | Career Total W/L | 32.14% (9-19) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Farzami vs E. Kldiashvili Match Preview:
- Kldiashvili has shown superior performance in recent months, winning 37.86% of points on their second serve, compared to Farzami's 12.5%. Could this serve as a significant determinant in predicting match outcomes?
- In return games, Farzami edges ahead slightly against second serves, capturing 53.33% of opponent's points, whereas Kldiashvili stands at 48.1%. How crucial might this return prowess be in tilting the match in Farzami's favor?
- Regarding first serve returns, Kldiashvili has a notable advantage, winning 30.3% of points against opponents, while Farzami only achieves 9.52%. This could indicate a key strength for Kldiashvili in this matchup.
- Under pressure, Kldiashvili has proven more resilient, saving 44% of breakpoints versus Farzami’s 33.33%, indicating better performance when facing critical points.
- Looking at overall match wins, Kldiashvili holds a slight edge over the past year with a win rate of 36.84%, compared to Farzami’s 33.33%.
- Kldiashvili’s preferred surface is Hard, boasting a 38% win rate, while Farzami excels on Clay with a 33% win rate, potentially giving Kldiashvili an advantage if this match is played on Hard courts.
- The average quality of opponents also varies, with Kldiashvili facing players ranked around 62, compared to Farzami facing players ranked around 207. This might reflect a tougher competition level for Kldiashvili and more robust experience.
- In deciding sets, Kldiashvili has managed a 33% victory rate, whereas Farzami struggles with a 0% win rate, indicating Kldiashvili might have the upper hand in longer matches.
- Examining breakpoint conversion, Kldiashvili again shows strength, converting 50% of opportunities, while Farzami has yet to convert any in recent form. Could this stat prove decisive during key moments in the match?
Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):
Assessing the strengths and recent performance trends of both players, Kldiashvili demonstrates a clear advantage across second serve points and breakpoint conversion. These aspects are often crucial in determining the outcome of matches.
Additionally, Kldiashvili’s ability to handle pressure, evidenced by a higher breakpoint save percentage, and their experience with stronger competition could play influential roles in the match.
While Farzami shows potential in return games, the lack of success in converting breakpoints and winning deciding sets may hinder their performance.
Based on these factors, Kldiashvili is the more likely candidate to emerge victorious in their upcoming encounter against Farzami.
Mandegar Farzami vs Ekaterina Kldiashvili Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Farzami vs E. Kldiashvili H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:21:45 | Average Match Time | 1:21:45 |
| 80% (43/54) | 1st Serve % | 66% (35/53) |
| 63% (27/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (17/35) |
| 73% (8/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 53% (28/53) | Return Points Win % | 35% (19/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Farzami Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
SF | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 7-6(2) 6-1 | ||
E. Kldiashvili Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-0 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||

M. Farzami vs E. Kldiashvili Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.61% (16/15) | YTD Win/Loss | 32.14% (9/19) |
| 52.31% (34/31) | Sets Win/Loss | 34.92% (22/41) |
| 52.29% (297/271) | Games Win/Loss | 44.78% (266/328) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 37.50% (6/10) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 4 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 57 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 213.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 81.57 |
| 74% (807/1090) | 1st Serve % | 65% (526/812) |
| 58% (471/807) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (258/526) |
| 42% (119/283) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (121/286) |
| 53% (71/133) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (41/100) |
| 48% (520/1086) | Return Points Win % | 44% (351/796) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 51.61% (16/15) | Futures W/L | 32.00% (8/17) |
| 52% (16/31) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (9/28) |
| 67% (4/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 100% (16/16) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (8/7) |
| 0% (16/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (8/1) |
| 0% (15/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (20/2) |